Suppliers
Processes
Sites
Effort · Potential exposure (illustrative)
Facility outage
Absorbed through alternative capacity
$2.3M / week
Cyberattack
Several critical processes affected at once
$4.5M / week
Critical supplier loss
Production halted across multiple locations
$7.2M / week
Illustrative figures for a mid-size manufacturer. Effort = similar planning, facilitation and participant time.
Exercise the scenarios that cost most
Human and AI participants
See where plans break
Plans · Investment decisions · The next exercise
✣ MEO Continuity
Know what’s at stake
MEO maps how a business really runs, identifies its critical dependencies, and puts a number on what a disruption would cost.
✣ Critical dependencies
The loss of a seemingly minor suppliercould halt production across multiple locations.
Consider a manufacturer that discovers a relatively small supplier supports a component used across several high-value production lines.
✣ The economics of choosing what to practice
Same exercise effort.Different exposure.
Without understanding those dependencies and their economic consequences, organizations risk allocating the same exercise effort to scenarios with vastly different levels of exposure.
✣ Preppr
Prove the plan holds
Preppr gives teams an AI-powered environment to practice against realistic scenarios, with human and AI participants, and shows whether the plans hold up.
✣ Improve
Feed lessons into the next cycle
Keep getting stronger by feeding lessons from each exercise into plans, investment decisions, and the next exercise.
✣ Quantify. Plan. Prove.
Every exercise represents an investment in organizational capability.
Understanding the economic consequences of disruption can help teams focus their practice on the decisions and dependencies that could make the greatest difference.
✣ MEO Continuity
Know what’s at stake
MEO maps how a business really runs, identifies its critical dependencies, and puts a number on what a disruption would cost.
✣ Critical dependencies
The loss of a seemingly minor supplier could halt production across multiple locations.
Consider a manufacturer that discovers a relatively small supplier supports a component used across several high-value production lines.
✣ The economics of choosing what to practice
Same exercise effort. Different exposure.
Without understanding those dependencies and their economic consequences, organizations risk allocating the same exercise effort to scenarios with vastly different levels of exposure.
Illustrative figures for a mid-size manufacturer. Effort = similar planning, facilitation and participant time.
✣ Preppr
Prove the plan holds
Preppr gives teams an AI-powered environment to practice against realistic scenarios, with human and AI participants, and shows whether the plans hold up.
✣ Improve
Feed lessons into the next cycle
Keep getting stronger by feeding lessons from each exercise into plans, investment decisions, and the next exercise.
✣ Quantify. Plan. Prove.
Every exercise represents an investment in organizational capability.
Understanding the economic consequences of disruption can help teams focus their practice on the decisions and dependencies that could make the greatest difference.
